As year-end approaches, the debate over the expiring Bush tax cuts is getting messy and harder to tolerate. Part of the reason is that there are more than just the usual suspects trying to advance clearly terrible proposals.
Sarabeth Guthberg at 1115.org had me squinting at her blistering critique of claims made by political advisor/economist Mark Zandi.
(He had it coming.) As a key advisor to House Speaker Pelosi, Zandi is
trying to rally support for permanent extension of the Bush tax cuts
benefiting the "middle class," and a one-year-but-not-really extension
of the tax breaks for those earning more than $250,000 per year (roughly the top
2%). He says it's necessary because the recovery is still too fragile, and that even the richest Americans "may be sensitive." (And, we wouldn't wanna make anyone cry, right?)
Experts from different sides of the board, including Paul Krugman and Alan Greenspan,
have sounded off, saying the Republican proposal to permanently extend
all of the Bush tax cuts is a bad idea. The tab for such a move would
run up to around $3.7 trillion over 10 years. Read more >>
August 27, 2010